For the week of Jan 25th - 29:
- Complete the Theme paragraphs for Islam.
- Complete first two sections of Huston Smith
- Read Rationalism and Empiricism sections of the TOK philosophies packet
For next week:
- Begin part III of the Islam packet: Themes of Religious Belief - Give specific examples of each section.
- Read the third section of the Smith -
- Read the unit 4 and 5 in the ToK packets.
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Who is this? He founded Scientology
Your journey is not yet complete. Young scholars of world religions, prepare for a journey through IA's, Sikkism, Islam and a review of Judaism, Christianity and Hinduism. And always remember, "In nature, the emphasis is in what is rather than what ought to be." So T.O.K.
Interesting Religious Figure of the Month
Who is this? He founded Scientology
12th Grade Comparative World Religion Student Blogs
These are great (Udesen approved) research locations
Udesen's Other Blogs
Blog Archive
Organizing Udesen's Blog
- assignment (1)
IB Rubric for Blogs (on most entries)
Here is a brief breakdown of how you will be graded on blog entries:
7: Excellence beyond reproach (you should be published)
6: Very good performance: Detailed knowledge and understanding, logically structured, appropriate terminology; analysis, evaluation and synthesis of knowledge; strong awareness of multiple perspectives; strong evidence and critical thinking
5: Good Performance: Sound knowledge and understanding; answers are logical and coherent, but could be extended; some integration of knowledge and concepts; tendency to be more descriptive than evaluative although shows contrasting views; solid evidence of critical thinking; an ability to analyze data
4: Strong Performance: Secure knowledge and understanding beyond 'common sense' points; ability to structure, but need to improve clarity and focus; ability to develop ideas, relate facts, substantiate assertions, but is more descriptive than analytical; ability to interpret data, solve problems and engage in analysis.
3: Mediocre performance: Demonstrates some knowledge and understanding; a basic use of terminology and structure; some ability to make links between facts and ideas. Assignment clearly lacks the depth of response.
2: Poor performance: limited knowledge and understanding, some sense of structure, limited use of terminology, limited ability to make links between facts and ideas. Information is very limited in depth expected for assignment.
1: Very poor performance: very limited knowledge and understanding; no clear structure, inadequate terminology, limited demonstration of understanding of data or analysis. Large gaps in demonstration or completion of expectations.
7: Excellence beyond reproach (you should be published)
6: Very good performance: Detailed knowledge and understanding, logically structured, appropriate terminology; analysis, evaluation and synthesis of knowledge; strong awareness of multiple perspectives; strong evidence and critical thinking
5: Good Performance: Sound knowledge and understanding; answers are logical and coherent, but could be extended; some integration of knowledge and concepts; tendency to be more descriptive than evaluative although shows contrasting views; solid evidence of critical thinking; an ability to analyze data
4: Strong Performance: Secure knowledge and understanding beyond 'common sense' points; ability to structure, but need to improve clarity and focus; ability to develop ideas, relate facts, substantiate assertions, but is more descriptive than analytical; ability to interpret data, solve problems and engage in analysis.
3: Mediocre performance: Demonstrates some knowledge and understanding; a basic use of terminology and structure; some ability to make links between facts and ideas. Assignment clearly lacks the depth of response.
2: Poor performance: limited knowledge and understanding, some sense of structure, limited use of terminology, limited ability to make links between facts and ideas. Information is very limited in depth expected for assignment.
1: Very poor performance: very limited knowledge and understanding; no clear structure, inadequate terminology, limited demonstration of understanding of data or analysis. Large gaps in demonstration or completion of expectations.
No comments:
Post a Comment